IPO questions to candidates applying for appointment to the Illinois Senate (20th District)

At the bottom of this are the questions being asked by the IPOs of candidates seeking appointment to the Illinois Senate.



Background: Sen. Cristina Pacione-Zayas is getting appointed to Mayor (of Chicago) Brandon Johnson's administration. Under Illinois law the committee persons of the incumbent's party (Democratic) get to appoint the replacement using a weighted voted system.

Those committee persons are:

The weighted vote of Gardiner is minor and Gonzalez, Rosenfeld, Villegas and Villivalam are minuscule.

The legitimacy of the weighting is dubious in that the ward maps have changed since redistricting, but that's not what this blog entry is about.

A group of IPOs (Chicago lexicon: independent political organizations) is conducting their own candidate screening. The IPOs fancy themselves as the challenge to the regular Democrats (machine Democrats). The sponsoring IPOs are:

Below are the questions the IPOs want candidates to answer. Of course, it starts with candidate contact information.

Bio/qualifications

Please write a brief candidate statement/bio including what makes you qualified for the State Senate seat, your leadership experience, issue campaigns you’ve worked on and your involvement in those campaigns, and how you’ve worked with community organizations in the 20th district.

The best

Briefly, why do you feel that you are the best candidate to represent the 20th district as State Senator? How will you advance the progressive agenda in this role?

Membership

Are you a member of an IPO? If so, which one(s)? For how long? If not, why not?

How work with us?

How do you envision your relationship with our IPOs once in this seat?

Top priority/rest of legislative session

What will be your top priority as state Senator, and what do you hope to accomplish in the remainder of this legislative session?

Voter trust

Historically the appointment process for a vacant state Senate seat has happened without input from voters. What will you do to build trust with your constituents, given that you are gaining your seat through an appointment?

Ongoing transparency/accountability

What is your plan to remain transparent and accountable to your constituents and the community organizations in your district? How will you continually be listening to and engaging with the community? 

Progressive Caucus

Will you commit to joining the Progressive Caucus in Springfield?

Eschew bad campaign contributions

Will you commit to not taking corporate campaign donations such as from real estate developers, fossil fuel companies, utility companies, private healthcare industry, etc.? 

Who did you support for Mayor?

In the 2023 municipal election cycle, which mayoral and aldermanic candidates did you publicly support? In what ways were you involved in these campaigns? 

The candidate questionnaire seems straightforward and well done to me. The list of bad contributions seems noteworthy that education reform advocates, privatizers, union busters and police adjacent businesses/security firms didn't make the list. However, "et cetera" might privately include some or all of those and the IPOs didn't want to scare off Martinez (closely linked to education reform), Cardona, Gardiner, Gonzalez & Reboyras (pro-cop) and Rosenfeld (a lobbyist).

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

best case scenario; worst case scenario... Trump winning might be a good thing

 So, November 3, 2020 is the U.S. election date for President, Congress & other stuff. What is the best case scenario? 1. There is no violence. 2. There is no interference with the right to vote in other ways. 3. The votes are counted in an orderly manner that does not invite allegations of corruption, malfeasance, incompetence or cheating. 4. The Democrats achieve 3/5 super majorities in both the US Senate (60 seats) and the US House (261 seats). 5. Left candidates for President get 15% or more of the vote. 6. Trump wins re-election with about 41% of the vote & Biden gets significantly more, eg 45% of the vote. 7. And various positive referendums pass, eg Illinois amending the state constitution to allow graduated income taxes. This scenario will force Democrats to actually govern in Congress. Nancy Pelosi has got shit out of the Democratic majority in the US House. And Chuck Schumer leads the Democrats like he's got 39 votes on his side, not the 47 (45 + 2) votes he actua...
Read more

Amend the US Constitution on voting rights

Proposed amendment on voting rights: Section 1. The people who are eligible to vote shall have the right to vote. Section 2. The people who cast legal votes have a right to have their votes counted. Section 3. Within states, the process of casting votes shall be substantially the same throughout the state. Section 4. The government shall not erect barriers to people voting. Casting a vote shall be equal in difficulty throughout a state. Section 5. The voting process shall be recorded in a way that close elections can be recounted & all elections can be audited for accuracy of the results. Section 6. States, Congress, the executive branch & the courts shall all be empowered to enforce these goals. States, Congress, the executive branch & the courts shall not be empowered to undermine or diminish these goals. Section 7. Courts shall be particularly vigilant to protect the voting rights of those historically excluded from the voting & electoral process. Section 8. Con...
Read more

born again blogging

 It's October 17, 2020. In the American (USian) theological tradition of being "born again", it seems like 2020 is a good point to be born again. So, my name is Carl Nyberg. I'm a blogger. I've been born again with this blog. And I'm here to criticize stuff that should be changed.
Read more