free expression or good ol' Islamophobia?

 In the United States, the Right embraces, a well armed society is a polite society. The quote is attributed to Robert Heinlein, a US Naval Academy graduate.

Recently Samuel Paty was killed for being rude.

Rather than portraying the death as accountability for bad manners, corporate media in the West is portraying Samuel Paty as a victim.

These same corporate media outlets refuse to see Julian Assange's case as a free speech issue. Like they didn't see Edward Snowden's. Or Chelsea Manning's. Or almost any national security state whistleblowers. (Reality Winner does get a tiny bit of sympathy because of the partisan political nature of her whistleblowing.)

Corporate media isn't embracing Samuel Paty b/c of their commitment to free expression; they embrace him b/c of their Islamophobia.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

best case scenario; worst case scenario... Trump winning might be a good thing

 So, November 3, 2020 is the U.S. election date for President, Congress & other stuff. What is the best case scenario? 1. There is no violence. 2. There is no interference with the right to vote in other ways. 3. The votes are counted in an orderly manner that does not invite allegations of corruption, malfeasance, incompetence or cheating. 4. The Democrats achieve 3/5 super majorities in both the US Senate (60 seats) and the US House (261 seats). 5. Left candidates for President get 15% or more of the vote. 6. Trump wins re-election with about 41% of the vote & Biden gets significantly more, eg 45% of the vote. 7. And various positive referendums pass, eg Illinois amending the state constitution to allow graduated income taxes. This scenario will force Democrats to actually govern in Congress. Nancy Pelosi has got shit out of the Democratic majority in the US House. And Chuck Schumer leads the Democrats like he's got 39 votes on his side, not the 47 (45 + 2) votes he actua...
Read more

Amend the US Constitution on voting rights

Proposed amendment on voting rights: Section 1. The people who are eligible to vote shall have the right to vote. Section 2. The people who cast legal votes have a right to have their votes counted. Section 3. Within states, the process of casting votes shall be substantially the same throughout the state. Section 4. The government shall not erect barriers to people voting. Casting a vote shall be equal in difficulty throughout a state. Section 5. The voting process shall be recorded in a way that close elections can be recounted & all elections can be audited for accuracy of the results. Section 6. States, Congress, the executive branch & the courts shall all be empowered to enforce these goals. States, Congress, the executive branch & the courts shall not be empowered to undermine or diminish these goals. Section 7. Courts shall be particularly vigilant to protect the voting rights of those historically excluded from the voting & electoral process. Section 8. Con...
Read more

born again blogging

 It's October 17, 2020. In the American (USian) theological tradition of being "born again", it seems like 2020 is a good point to be born again. So, my name is Carl Nyberg. I'm a blogger. I've been born again with this blog. And I'm here to criticize stuff that should be changed.
Read more